I went to my first day of the midterm believing that the exam was a hands-on midterm, but the first part of it was not. I studied a lot, I redid all my assignments and I was feeling good about it. There were several questions, which I did not have any clue it would be questioning on the exam. The questions seem simple at the first, but when I took a second look at them, they were a little trick. I left the first part of the midterm with a huge felling of frustration. I knew I could do much better if I had some guideline to study from. Also would be helpful if the Professor had expended some time talking about the midterm in class. My big surprise was the exam format. The fact the questions jump from fill in the blanc to hands on or to talk about what you know to hands on activity. The exam format was definitely a surprise. Becomes very hard to take a test when you don’t know what to expect from the test, and what the professor is expecting from you. The frustration grows bigger when the professor was not able to help us clarify any questions we have about the test. I saw myself on my own. The second day of the midterm it was better, at least I kind of new how it could be, and also it was more hands on material. I believe I did a little better this day. I’m sure the professor has her reasons to split the midterm in two sections and to choose a exam with this little confuse format, but I’m not here to questioning that. I did my best with the little understanding I had about the questions, but I could do much better if I could have access to clarify them.
“Good teaching is loving and listening, sharing and supporting. It is being passionately human. That is the point at which a good teacher begins.”
-Author Unknown